article Open AccessTop 1% cited
Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2015 · Vol. 44(2) · pp. 512–525
Jack Bowden✉(MRC Biostatistics Unit)George Davey Smith(MRC Biostatistics Unit)Stephen Burgess(University of Bristol)
Abstract
An adaption of Egger regression (which we call MR-Egger) can detect some violations of the standard instrumental variable assumptions, and provide an effect estimate which is not subject to these violations. The approach provides a sensitivity analysis for the robustness of the findings from a Mendelian randomization investigation.
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGene expression and cancer classificationMendelian randomizationRegressionStatisticsMeta-regressionRandomizationPublication biasEstimationEconometricsRegression analysisMedicine
MeSH terms
Blood PressureBody HeightCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansModels, BiologicalRegression AnalysisRespirationStatistics as TopicGenetic VariationMeta-Analysis as TopicBiasCausalityRisk AssessmentMendelian Randomization AnalysisGenetic Pleiotropy
Funding
- Medical Research Council
Citations
10,342
FWCI
124.75
field-weighted impact
References
51
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2017 · 2,224 citations
Statistical inference in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization using robust adjusted profile score
The Annals of Statistics · 2020 · 780 citations
Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods
Statistics in Medicine · 2015 · 1,225 citations
A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two‐sample summary data Mendelian randomization
Statistics in Medicine · 2017 · 1,983 citations
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies
Human Molecular Genetics · 2018 · 1,633 citations
An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2018 · 1,128 citations
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration
BMJ · 2021 · 1,621 citations
Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2016 · 1,697 citations
References
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2001 · 3,689 citations
Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology
Statistics in Medicine · 2007 · 4,904 citations
Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
Biometrics · 2000 · 13,532 citations
Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies
BMJ · 2009 · 2,765 citations
Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies
Human Molecular Genetics · 2014 · 4,933 citations
‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?*
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2003 · 6,297 citations
Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2012 · 1,895 citations
Related articles
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
BMJ · 1997 · 55,187 citations
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2000 · 2,251 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
