Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis

Biometrics · 2000 · Vol. 56(2) · pp. 455–463
Sue DuvalRichard L. Tweedie

Abstract

We study recently developed nonparametric methods for estimating the number of missing studies that might exist in a meta-analysis and the effect that these studies might have had on its outcome. These are simple rank-based data augmentation techniques, which formalize the use of funnel plots. We show that they provide effective and relatively powerful tests for evaluating the existence of such publication bias. After adjusting for missing studies, we find that the point estimate of the overall effect size is approximately correct and coverage of the effect size confidence intervals is substantially improved, in many cases recovering the nominal confidence levels entirely. We illustrate the trim and fill method on existing meta-analyses of studies in clinical trials and psychometrics.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsData Analysis with RPublication biasFunnel plotMeta-analysisConfidence intervalStatisticsNonparametric statisticsComputer sciencePoint estimationEconometricsMissing data

MeSH terms

Analysis of VarianceBiometryClinical Trials as TopicHumansPsychometricsPublishingMeta-Analysis as TopicBiasStatistics, Nonparametric
Citations
13,532
FWCI
25.15
field-weighted impact
References
30
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Psychological Bulletin · 1979 · 8,473 citations
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Biometrics · 1995 · 3,672 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.