Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies

International Journal of Epidemiology · 2012 · Vol. 42(5) · pp. 1497–1501
Marie‐Jo BrionKonstantin ShakhbazovPeter M. Visscher

Abstract

In Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, where genetic variants are used as proxy measures for an exposure trait of interest, obtaining adequate statistical power is frequently a concern due to the small amount of variation in a phenotypic trait that is typically explained by genetic variants. A range of power estimates based on simulations and specific parameters for two-stage least squares (2SLS) MR analyses based on continuous variables has previously been published. However there are presently no specific equations or software tools one can implement for calculating power of a given MR study. Using asymptotic theory, we show that in the case of continuous variables and a single instrument, for example a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) or multiple SNP predictor, statistical power for a fixed sample size is a function of two parameters: the proportion of variation in the exposure variable explained by the genetic predictor and the true causal association between the exposure and outcome variable. We demonstrate that power for 2SLS MR can be derived using the non-centrality parameter (NCP) of the statistical test that is employed to test whether the 2SLS regression coefficient is zero. We show that the previously published power estimates from simulations can be represented theoretically using this NCP-based approach, with similar estimates observed when the simulation-based estimates are compared with our NCP-based approach. General equations for calculating statistical power for 2SLS MR using the NCP are provided in this note, and we implement the calculations in a web-based application.

Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetics and Plant BreedingMendelian randomizationStatistical powerStatisticsSample size determinationResamplingMathematicsType I and type II errorsStatistical hypothesis testingTraitEconometrics

MeSH terms

HumansStatistics as TopicCausalitySample SizeMendelian Randomization Analysis

Funding

  • Wellcome Trust
  • Fondation Leducq
  • Seventh Framework Programme
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Citations
1,895
FWCI
5.79
field-weighted impact
References
11
Percentile
97%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Five Years of GWAS Discovery
The American Journal of Human Genetics · 2012 · 2,534 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.