Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Subtyping of Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry to Investigate a Relationship between Subtype and Short and Long Term Survival: A Collaborative Analysis of Data for 10,159 Cases from 12 Studies

PLoS Medicine · 2010 · Vol. 7(5) · pp. e1000279–e1000279
Fiona M. BlowsKristy DriverMarjanka K. SchmidtAnnegien BroeksFlora E. van LeeuwenJelle WesselingMaggie C.U. CheangKaren A. GelmonTorsten O. NielsenCarl BlomqvistPäivi HeikkiläTuomas HeikkinenHeli NevanlinnaLars A. AkslenLouis R. BéginWilliam D. FoulkesFergus J. CouchXianshu WangVicky CafourekJanet E. OlsonLaura BagliettoGraham G. GilesGianluca SeveriCatriona McLeanMelissa C. SoutheyEmad A. RakhaAndrew R. GreenIan O. EllisMark E. ShermanJolanta LissowskaWilliam F. AndersonAngela CoxSimon S. CrossMalcolm ReedElena ProvenzanoSarah‐Jane DawsonAlison M. DunningManjeet K. HumphreysDouglas F. EastonMontserrat García‐ClosasCarlos CaldasPaul D.P. PharoahDavid G. Huntsman

Abstract

The six subtypes of breast cancer defined by expression of five markers show distinct behaviours with important differences in short term and long term prognosis. Application of these markers in the clinical setting could have the potential to improve the targeting of adjuvant chemotherapy to those most likely to benefit. The different patterns of mortality over time also suggest important biological differences between the subtypes that may result in differences in response to specific therapies, and that stratification of breast cancers by clinically relevant subtypes in clinical trials is urgently required.

Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchBreast Lesions and CarcinomasBreast cancerImmunohistochemistrySubtypingCytokeratinOncologyInternal medicineHormone receptorProgesterone receptorCancerBasal (medicine)

MeSH terms

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHormonesHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratinsMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, Cell SurfaceBiomarkers, TumorProportional Hazards ModelsYoung Adult

Funding

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Sanofi
  • Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
  • Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Breast Cancer Campaign
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Cancer Council Victoria
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Cancer Institute
Citations
1,150
FWCI
28.54
field-weighted impact
References
37
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.