Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Comparison of Spray‐drying, Drum‐drying and Freeze‐drying for β‐Carotene Encapsulation and Preservation

Journal of Food Science · 1997 · Vol. 62(6) · pp. 1158–1162
Stéphane DesobryFlávia Maria NettoTheodore P. Labuza

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pure β‐carotene was encapsulated in 25 Dextrose Equivalent maltodextrin by three drying processes (spray, freeze and drum). Stability was studied at 11% and 32% RH and 25°C, 35°C and 45°C. No significant influence of %RH was observed on the retention of β‐carotene. Oxidation followed first order kinetics with an initial fast first order reaction followed by a second much slower first order reaction period. Although drum‐drying caused more initial loss in drying, the lower surface carotenoids and larger particle size resulted in greater stability as compared to the other methods. The chromametric measurements of “L” and “a” corresponded to the other kinetics and indicated that the first period rapid loss corresponded to the oxidation of surface carotenoids.

Microencapsulation and Drying ProcessesFreezing and Crystallization ProcessesFood Drying and ModelingMaltodextrinSpray dryingKineticsChemistryCaroteneCarotenoidParticle sizeFirst orderChromatographyDrum
Citations
437
FWCI
6.17
field-weighted impact
References
15
Percentile
96%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.