Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption

International Journal of Epidemiology · 2018 · Vol. 48(3) · pp. 728–742
Jack BowdenFabiola Del Greco MCosetta MinelliQingyuan ZhaoDebbie A. LawlorNuala A. SheehanJohn R. ThompsonGeorge Davey Smith

Abstract

We propose the use of modified weights within two-sample summary-data MR studies for accurately quantifying heterogeneity and detecting outliers in the presence of weak instruments. Modified weights also have an important role to play in terms of causal estimation (in tandem with first-order weights) but further research is required to understand their strengths and weaknesses in specific settings.

Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsMendelian randomizationEconometricsStatisticsSample size determinationWeightingMathematicsVariance (accounting)RegressionInstrumental variableCausality (physics)

MeSH terms

Blood PressureCoronary DiseaseHumansMonte Carlo MethodPolymorphism, Single NucleotideMendelian Randomization Analysis

Funding

  • University of Bristol
  • Medical Research Council
Citations
1,004
FWCI
21.70
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.