Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

A power primer.

Psychological Bulletin · 1992 · Vol. 112(1) · pp. 155–159
Jacob Cohen

Abstract

One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.

Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsContingency tableStatisticsSign testStatistical significanceStatistical powerSample size determinationMathematicsStatistical hypothesis testingChi-square testSample (material)
Citations
8,724
FWCI
4.98
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
95%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Related articles
A power primer.
Psychological Bulletin · 1992 · 8,724 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.