Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility

PLoS Computational Biology · 2015 · Vol. 11(12) · pp. e1004586–e1004586
Pradeep Anand RavindranathStefano ForliDavid S. GoodsellArthur J. OlsonMichel F. Sanner

Abstract

Automated docking of drug-like molecules into receptors is an essential tool in structure-based drug design. While modeling receptor flexibility is important for correctly predicting ligand binding, it still remains challenging. This work focuses on an approach in which receptor flexibility is modeled by explicitly specifying a set of receptor side-chains a-priori. The challenges of this approach include the: 1) exponential growth of the search space, demanding more efficient search methods; and 2) increased number of false positives, calling for scoring functions tailored for flexible receptor docking. We present AutoDockFR-AutoDock for Flexible Receptors (ADFR), a new docking engine based on the AutoDock4 scoring function, which addresses the aforementioned challenges with a new Genetic Algorithm (GA) and customized scoring function. We validate ADFR using the Astex Diverse Set, demonstrating an increase in efficiency and reliability of its GA over the one implemented in AutoDock4. We demonstrate greatly increased success rates when cross-docking ligands into apo receptors that require side-chain conformational changes for ligand binding. These cross-docking experiments are based on two datasets: 1) SEQ17 -a receptor diversity set containing 17 pairs of apo-holo structures; and 2) CDK2 -a ligand diversity set composed of one CDK2 apo structure and 52 known bound inhibitors. We show that, when cross-docking ligands into the apo conformation of the receptors with up to 14 flexible side-chains, ADFR reports more correctly cross-docked ligands than AutoDock Vina on both datasets with solutions found for 70.6% vs. 35.3% systems on SEQ17, and 76.9% vs. 61.5% on CDK2. ADFR also outperforms AutoDock Vina in number of top ranking solutions on both datasets. Furthermore, we show that correctly docked CDK2 complexes re-create on average 79.8% of all pairwise atomic interactions between the ligand and moving receptor atoms in the holo complexes. Finally, we show that down-weighting the receptor internal energy improves the ranking of correctly docked poses and that runtime for AutoDockFR scales linearly when side-chain flexibility is added.

Computational Drug Discovery MethodsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisProtein Degradation and InhibitorsDocking (animal)AutoDockProtein–ligand dockingSearching the conformational space for dockingComputational biologyComputer scienceDrug discoveryBioinformaticsProtein structureChemistry

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsBinding SitesLigandsModels, ChemicalProtein BindingProteinsSoftwareDrug DesignProtein Interaction MappingMolecular Docking Simulation
Citations
649
FWCI
9.49
field-weighted impact
References
44
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2003 · 3,013 citations
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2009 · 24,168 citations
The Protein Data Bank
Nucleic Acids Research · 2000 · 39,191 citations
A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation
Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2007 · 2,203 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.