Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function

Journal of Computational Chemistry · 1998 · Vol. 19(14) · pp. 1639–1662
Garrett M. MorrisDavid S. GoodsellRobert S. HallidayRuth HueyWilliam E. HartRichard K. BelewArthur J. Olson

Abstract

A novel and robust automated docking method that predicts the bound conformations of flexible ligands to macromolecular targets has been developed and tested, in combination with a new scoring function that estimates the free energy change upon binding. Interestingly, this method applies a Lamarckian model of genetics, in which environmental adaptations of an individual's phenotype are reverse transcribed into its genotype and become heritable traits (sic). We consider three search methods, Monte Carlo simulated annealing, a traditional genetic algorithm, and the Lamarckian genetic algorithm, and compare their performance in dockings of seven protein–ligand test systems having known three-dimensional structure. We show that both the traditional and Lamarckian genetic algorithms can handle ligands with more degrees of freedom than the simulated annealing method used in earlier versions of AUTODOCK, and that the Lamarckian genetic algorithm is the most efficient, reliable, and successful of the three. The empirical free energy function was calibrated using a set of 30 structurally known protein–ligand complexes with experimentally determined binding constants. Linear regression analysis of the observed binding constants in terms of a wide variety of structure-derived molecular properties was performed. The final model had a residual standard error of 9.11 kJ mol−1 (2.177 kcal mol−1) and was chosen as the new energy function. The new search methods and empirical free energy function are available in AUTODOCK, version 3.0. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 19: 1639–1662, 1998

Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsClick Chemistry and ApplicationsAutoDockSimulated annealingDocking (animal)Genetic algorithmAlgorithmMonte Carlo methodComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationChemistry
Citations
10,757
FWCI
51.57
field-weighted impact
References
72
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2003 · 848 citations
Binding Affinity via Docking: Fact and Fiction
Molecules · 2018 · 686 citations
Roulette-wheel selection via stochastic acceptance
Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · 2011 · 740 citations
MolDock:  A New Technique for High-Accuracy Molecular Docking
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2006 · 2,292 citations
ABCluster: the artificial bee colony algorithm for cluster global optimization
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2015 · 722 citations
A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation
Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2007 · 2,203 citations
References
Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 1990 · 1,271 citations
A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins
Journal of the American Chemical Society · 1984 · 4,632 citations
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Science · 1983 · 44,165 citations
Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath
The Journal of Chemical Physics · 1984 · 30,535 citations
Satisfying Hydrogen Bonding Potential in Proteins
Journal of Molecular Biology · 1994 · 2,130 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.