Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement

PLoS Medicine · 2015 · Vol. 12(10) · pp. e1001885–e1001885
Eric I. BenchimolLiam SmeethAstrid GuttmannKatie HarronDavid MoherIrene PetersenHenrik Toft SørensenErik von ElmSinéad Langan

Abstract

Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.

Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChecklistObservational studyStrengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiologyTransparency (behavior)Consolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsMedicineMEDLINEFamily medicineComputer scienceAlternative medicine

MeSH terms

Research DesignGuidelines as TopicBiomedical ResearchChecklistResearch ReportObservational Studies as Topic

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
Citations
5,010
FWCI
70.98
field-weighted impact
References
93
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement · Scinovex