article Open AccessTop 1% cited
Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
PLoS Medicine · 2010 · Vol. 7(2) · pp. e1000217–e1000217
David Moher✉(University of Ottawa)Kenneth F. Schulz(Family Health International 360)Iveta Simera(University of Oxford)Douglas G. Altman(University of Oxford)
Abstract
David Moher and colleagues from the EQUATOR network offer guidance and recommended steps for developing health research reporting guidelines.
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMedicineMEDLINEFamily medicineData sciencePolitical scienceComputer science
MeSH terms
HumansPublishingGuidelines as TopicBiomedical Research
Funding
- University of Ottawa
- Cancer Research UK
- Medical Research Council
Citations
1,449
FWCI
30.30
field-weighted impact
References
64
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 7,821 citations
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 5,044 citations
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
British Journal of Pharmacology · 2020 · 930 citations
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
British journal of surgery · 2015 · 827 citations
SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2013 · 7,845 citations
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
BMJ Open · 2021 · 748 citations
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration
BMJ · 2021 · 1,621 citations
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
BMJ · 2013 · 6,963 citations
References
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review
The Medical Journal of Australia · 2006 · 883 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2009 · 37,606 citations
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
JAMA · 1995 · 5,583 citations
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2007 · 16,762 citations
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 902 citations
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement
PLoS Medicine · 2009 · 777 citations
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
PLoS ONE · 2008 · 1,535 citations
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
BMJ · 2012 · 3,524 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.