Scinovex
article

Interrater Reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale

Archives of Neurology · 1989 · Vol. 46(6) · pp. 660–662
Larry B. GoldsteinC. BertelsJames N. Davis

Abstract

The interobserver reliability of a rating scale employed in several multicenter stroke trials was investigated. Twenty patients who had a stroke were rated with this scale by four clinical stroke fellows. Each patient was independently evaluated by one pair of observers. The degree of interrater agreement for each item on the scale was determined by calculation of the kappa statistic. Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for 9 of 13 items. This rating system compares favorably with other scales for which such comparisons can be made. However, the validity of this system must be established.

Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryReliability and Agreement in MeasurementInter-rater reliabilityRating scaleKappaStroke (engine)Cohen's kappaStatisticPsychologyReliability (semiconductor)Scale (ratio)Physical therapy

MeSH terms

Cerebrovascular DisordersHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Severity of Illness IndexStatistics as TopicUnited States
Citations
988
FWCI
1.89
field-weighted impact
References
19
Percentile
86%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Psychological Bulletin · 1971 · 8,372 citations
Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 1981 · 1,105 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.