review Open AccessTop 1% cited
A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face‐to‐face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education
Journal of Advanced Nursing · 2014 · Vol. 71(2) · pp. 255–270
Karen McCutcheon✉(Queen's University Belfast)Maria Lohan(Queen's University Belfast)Marian Traynor(Queen's University Belfast)Daphne Martin(Queen's University Belfast)
Abstract
The available evidence suggests that online learning for teaching clinical skills is no less effective than traditional means. Highlighted by this review is the lack of available evidence on the implementation of a blended learning approach to teaching clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of this teaching methodology.
Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareOnline and Blended LearningInnovations in Medical EducationCritical appraisalBlended learningMedical educationPsychological interventionObservational studyCritical thinkingSystematic reviewPsychologyMEDLINEMedicine
MeSH terms
Clinical CompetenceConsumer BehaviorEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEducation, NursingHumansResearch DesignTeachingEducation, DistanceSelf EfficacyInternet
Citations
613
FWCI
11.80
field-weighted impact
References
38
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2019 · 671 citations
The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2016 · 698 citations
References
Instructional Design Variations in Internet-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Academic Medicine · 2010 · 578 citations
Related articles
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
