Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

<i>Planck</i> 2018 results

Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2020 · Vol. 641 · pp. A6–A6
N. AghanimY. AkramiM. AshdownJ. AumontC. BaccigalupiM. BallardiniA. J. BandayR. B. BarreiroN. BartoloS. BasakRichard A. BattyeK. BenabedJ.-P. BernardM. BersanelliP. BielewiczJ. J. BockJ. R. BondJ. BorrillF. R. BouchetF. BoulangerM. BucherC. BuriganaR. C. ButlerE. CalabreseJ.-F. CardosoJulien CarronA. ChallinorH. C. ChiangJens ChlubaL. P. L. ColomboCéline CombetD. ContrerasB. P. CrillF. CuttaiaP. de BernardisG. de ZottiG. de ZottiJ.‐M. DelouisEleonora Di ValentinoJ. M. DiegoJ. M. DiegoM. DouspisA. DucoutX. DupacS. DusiniG. EfstathiouF. ElsnerT. A. EnßlinH. K. EriksenY. FantayeM. FarhangJ. FergussonR. Fernández-CobosF. Finelli⋆F. ForastieriM. FrailisA. A. FraisseE. FranceschiA. FrolovS. GaleottaS. GalliK. GangaR. T. Génova-SantosM. GerbinoT. GhoshJ. González-NuevoK. M. GórskiS. GrattonA. GruppusoJ. E. GudmundssonJ. HamannWill HandleyF. K. HansenD. HerranzS. R. HildebrandtE. HivonZhiqi HuangAndrew H. JaffeW. C. JonesA. KarakciE. KeihänenR. KeskitaloK. KiiveriJ. KimT. S. KisnerL. KnoxN. KrachmalnicoffM. KunzH. Kurki‐SuonioG. LagacheJ.-M. LamarreA. LasenbyM. LattanziC. R. LawrenceM. Le JeunePablo LemosJ. LesgourguesF. LevrierAntony LewisM. LiguoriP. B. LiljeM. LilleyV. LindholmM. López-CaniegoP. M. LubinYin-Zhe MaJ. F. Macías–PérezG. MaggioD. MainoN. MandolesiA. MangilliA. Marcos-CaballeroM. MarisP. G. MartinM. MartinelliE. Martínez-GonzálezS. MatarreseN. MauriJ. D. McEwenP. R. MeinholdA. MelchiorriA. MennellaM. MigliaccioM. MilleaS. MitraM.-A. Miville-DeschênesD. MolinariL. MontierG. MorganteA. MossP. NatoliH. U. Nørgaard-NielsenL. PaganoD. PaolettiB. PartridgeG. PatanchonHiranya V. PeirisF. PerrottaV. PettorinoF. PiacentiniL. PolastriG. PolentaJ.-L. PugetJ. P. RachenM. ReineckeM. RemazeillesA. RenziG. RochaC. RossetG. RoudierJ. A. Rubiño-MartínB. Ruiz-GranadosL. SalvatiM. SandriМ. СавелайненD. ScottE. P. S. ShellardC. SirignanoG. SirriL. D. SpencerR. SunyaevA.-S. Suur-UskiJ. A. TauberD. TavagnaccoM. TentiL. ToffolattiM. TomasiT. TrombettiL. ValenzianoJ. VäliviitaB. Van TentL. VibertP. VielvaF. VillaN. VittorioB. D. WandeltI. K. WehusMartin WhiteS. D. M. WhiteA. ZaccheiA. Zonca

Abstract

We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction. Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters. Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on many parameters, with residual modelling uncertainties estimated to affect them only at the 0.5 σ level. We find good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted “base ΛCDM” in this paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar spectral index n s = 0.965 ± 0.004, and optical depth τ = 0.054 ± 0.007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is measured to 0.03% precision, with 100 θ * = 1.0411 ± 0.0003. These results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable, with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions. Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant H 0 = (67.4 ± 0.5) km s −1 Mpc −1 ; matter density parameter Ω m = 0.315 ± 0.007; and matter fluctuation amplitude σ 8 = 0.811 ± 0.006. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model. Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and considering single-parameter extensions) we constrain the effective extra relativistic degrees of freedom to be N eff = 2.99 ± 0.17, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction N eff = 3.046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained to ∑ m ν &lt; 0.12 eV. The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2 σ , which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAO data. The joint constraint with BAO measurements on spatial curvature is consistent with a flat universe, Ω K = 0.001 ± 0.002. Also combining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w 0 = −1.03 ± 0.03, consistent with a cosmological constant. We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r 0.002 &lt; 0.06. Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey’s combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 3.6 σ , tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value). Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data.

Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyPhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundAstrophysicsSpectral indexHubble's lawOmegaPlanckSpectral densityCosmologyMatter power spectrum

Funding

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • UK Space Agency
  • European Commission
  • Science Foundation Ireland
  • Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBL
  • Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
  • Tekes
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules
Citations
13,396
FWCI
977.84
field-weighted impact
References
528
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2020 · 601 citations
Curvature tension: Evidence for a closed universe
Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021 · 365 citations
The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics
The Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2023 · 729 citations
A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642
The Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2021 · 416 citations
<i>Planck</i>2018 results
Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2019 · 2,320 citations
Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2023 · 346 citations
<i>Planck</i> 2018 results
Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2020 · 13,396 citations
References
Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015 · 716 citations
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
The Astrophysical Journal · 1999 · 16,971 citations
The effects of He I λ10830 on helium abundance determinations
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2015 · 395 citations
Structure in the COBE differential microwave radiometer first-year maps
The Astrophysical Journal · 1992 · 2,411 citations
Essential building blocks of dark energy
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2013 · 381 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.