Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

The Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2023 · Vol. 951(1) · pp. L11–L11
Adeela AfzalGabriella AgazieAkash AnumarlapudiAnne M. ArchibaldZaven ArzoumanianP. T. BakerB. BécsyJosé J. Blanco-PilladoLaura BlechaKimberly K. BoddyAdam BrazierPaul R. BrookSarah Burke-SpolaorRand BurnetteRobin CaseMaria CharisiShami ChatterjeeKaterina ChatziioannouB. D. CheeseboroSiyuan ChenTyler CohenJ. M. CordesNeil J. CornishF. CrawfordH. Thankful CromartieKathryn CrowterCurt CutlerMegan E. DeCesarDallas DeGanPaul DemorestHeling DengTimothy DolchBrendan DrachlerRichard von EckardsteinE. C. FerraraWilliam FioreEmmanuel FonsecaGabriel E. FreedmanNate Garver-DanielsPeter A. GentileKyle A. GersbachJoseph GlaserDeborah C. GoodL. GuertinKayhan GültekinJeffrey S. HazbounSophie HourihaneKristina IsloRoss J. JenningsAaron D. JohnsonMegan L. JonesAndrew R. KaiserD. L. KaplanLuke Zoltan KelleyM. KerrJ. S. KeyNima LaalMichael T. LamWilliam G. LambT. Joseph W. LazioVincent S. H. LeeN. LewandowskaRafael R. Lino dos SantosT. B. LittenbergTingting LiuD. R. LorimerJing LuoRyan S. LynchChung‐Pei MaDustin R. MadisonAlexander McEwenJames W. McKeeM. A. McLaughlinNatasha McMannBradley W. MeyersP. M. MeyersChiara M. F. MingarelliAndrea MitridateJonathan NayPriyamvada NatarajanCherry NgDavid J. NiceStella Koch OckerKen D. OlumTimothy T. PennucciBenetge B. P. PereraPolina PetrovNihan S. PolH. A. RadovanS. M. RansomPaul S. RayJoseph D. RomanoShashwat C. SardesaiAnn SchmiedekampCarl SchmiedekampKai SchmitzTobias SchröderLevi SchultBrent J. Shapiro-AlbertXavier SiemensJoseph SimonMagdalena S. SiwekI. H. StairsDaniel R. StinebringK. StovallPeter StratmannJerry P. SunAbhimanyu SusobhananJoseph K. SwiggumJacob TaylorStephen R. TaylorTanner TrickleJacob E. TurnerCaner ÜnalMichele VallisneriSonali VermaSarah J. VigelandHaley M. WahlQiaohong WangCaitlin A. WittDavid WrightOlivia YoungKathryn M. Zurek

Abstract

Abstract The 15 yr pulsar timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) shows positive evidence for the presence of a low-frequency gravitational-wave (GW) background. In this paper, we investigate potential cosmological interpretations of this signal, specifically cosmic inflation, scalar-induced GWs, first-order phase transitions, cosmic strings, and domain walls. We find that, with the exception of stable cosmic strings of field theory origin, all these models can reproduce the observed signal. When compared to the standard interpretation in terms of inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs), many cosmological models seem to provide a better fit resulting in Bayes factors in the range from 10 to 100. However, these results strongly depend on modeling assumptions about the cosmic SMBHB population and, at this stage, should not be regarded as evidence for new physics. Furthermore, we identify excluded parameter regions where the predicted GW signal from cosmological sources significantly exceeds the NANOGrav signal. These parameter constraints are independent of the origin of the NANOGrav signal and illustrate how pulsar timing data provide a new way to constrain the parameter space of these models. Finally, we search for deterministic signals produced by models of ultralight dark matter (ULDM) and dark matter substructures in the Milky Way. We find no evidence for either of these signals and thus report updated constraints on these models. In the case of ULDM, these constraints outperform torsion balance and atomic clock constraints for ULDM coupled to electrons, muons, or gluons.

Pulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaSet (abstract data type)Data setPhysicsComputer scienceAstronomyData scienceArtificial intelligence

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
Citations
729
FWCI
130.64
field-weighted impact
References
241
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background
The Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2023 · 1,383 citations
References
Cosmic strings and domain walls
Physics Reports · 1985 · 2,016 citations
Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector
Classical and Quantum Gravity · 2014 · 3,931 citations
Energy budget of cosmological first-order phase transitions
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2010 · 591 citations
Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 1978 · 3,625 citations
Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle
Classical and Quantum Gravity · 2012 · 425 citations
Gravitational wave production by collisions: more bubbles
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2008 · 549 citations
The Einstein Telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory
Classical and Quantum Gravity · 2010 · 2,272 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics · Scinovex