Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline

BMJ · 2020 · Vol. 368 · pp. l6890–l6890
Mhairi CampbellJoanne E. McKenzieAmanda SowdenSrinivasa Vittal KatikireddiSue BrennanSimon EllisJamie Hartmann‐BoyceRebecca RyanSasha ShepperdJames ThomasVivian WelchHilary Thomson

Abstract

In systematic reviews that lack data amenable to meta-analysis, alternative synthesis methods are commonly used, but these methods are rarely reported. This lack of transparency in the methods can cast doubt on the validity of the review findings. The Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline has been developed to guide clear reporting in reviews of interventions in which alternative synthesis methods to meta-analysis of effect estimates are used. This article describes the development of the SWiM guideline for the synthesis of quantitative data of intervention effects and presents the nine SWiM reporting items with accompanying explanations and examples.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in ResearchHealth Policy Implementation ScienceGuidelineMeta-analysisPsychological interventionSystematic reviewTransparency (behavior)Computer scienceData extractionMedicineMEDLINEManagement science

MeSH terms

Data AccuracySystematic Reviews as TopicData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansResearch DesignMeta-Analysis as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Funding

  • Scottish Government
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Citations
3,666
FWCI
309.94
field-weighted impact
References
36
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.