article Open AccessTop 1% cited
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
PLoS Medicine · 2021 · Vol. 18(3) · pp. e1003583–e1003583
Matthew J. Page✉(Monash University)Joanne E. McKenzie✉(Monash University)Patrick M. Bossuyt✉(University of Amsterdam)Isabelle Boutron✉(Inserm)Tammy Hoffmann✉(Bond University)Cynthia D. Mulrow✉(The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio)Larissa Shamseer✉(University of Ottawa)Jennifer Tetzlaff✉Elie A. Akl✉(Impact)Sue Brennan✉(Monash University)Roger Chou✉(Oregon Health & Science University)Julie Glanville✉(Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust)Jeremy Grimshaw✉(University of Ottawa)Asbjørn Hróbjartsson✉(University of Southern Denmark)Manoj M. Lalu✉(Ottawa Hospital)Tianjing Li✉(Johns Hopkins University)Elizabeth Loder✉(Brigham and Women's Hospital)Evan Mayo‐Wilson✉(Indiana University Bloomington)Steve McDonald✉(Monash University)Luke A. McGuinness✉(University of Bristol)Lesley Stewart✉(University of York)James Thomas✉(University College London)Andrea C. Tricco✉(St. Michael's Hospital)Vivian Welch✉(University of Ottawa)Penny Whiting✉(University of Bristol)David Moher✉(University of Ottawa)
Abstract
Matthew Page and co-authors describe PRISMA 2020, an updated reporting guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Sciences Research and EducationDelphi Technique in ResearchSystematic reviewGuidelineMedicineMEDLINEStatement (logic)Meta-analysisFamily medicineMedical physicsPolitical sciencePathology
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as TopicHumansPublishingEvidence-Based Medicine
Funding
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- National Eye Institute
Citations
4,711
FWCI
332.37
field-weighted impact
References
77
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2015 · 2,109 citations
The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 7,821 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2009 · 37,606 citations
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2009 · 10,387 citations
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 902 citations
Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
PLoS Medicine · 2010 · 1,449 citations
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
BMJ · 2009 · 17,433 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
BMJ · 2009 · 82,871 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.