Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations

International Journal of Epidemiology · 2017 · Vol. 47(1) · pp. 226–235
Marcus R. MunafòKate TillingAmy E. TaylorDavid M. EvansGeorge Davey Smith

Abstract

Large-scale cross-sectional and cohort studies have transformed our understanding of the genetic and environmental determinants of health outcomes. However, the representativeness of these samples may be limited-either through selection into studies, or by attrition from studies over time. Here we explore the potential impact of this selection bias on results obtained from these studies, from the perspective that this amounts to conditioning on a collider (i.e. a form of collider bias). Whereas it is acknowledged that selection bias will have a strong effect on representativeness and prevalence estimates, it is often assumed that it should not have a strong impact on estimates of associations. We argue that because selection can induce collider bias (which occurs when two variables independently influence a third variable, and that third variable is conditioned upon), selection can lead to substantially biased estimates of associations. In particular, selection related to phenotypes can bias associations with genetic variants associated with those phenotypes. In simulations, we show that even modest influences on selection into, or attrition from, a study can generate biased and potentially misleading estimates of both phenotypic and genotypic associations. Our results highlight the value of knowing which population your study sample is representative of. If the factors influencing selection and attrition are known, they can be adjusted for. For example, having DNA available on most participants in a birth cohort study offers the possibility of investigating the extent to which polygenic scores predict subsequent participation, which in turn would enable sensitivity analyses of the extent to which bias might distort estimates.

Health, Environment, Cognitive AgingHealth disparities and outcomesAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesColliderSelection biasSelection (genetic algorithm)AttritionRepresentativeness heuristicPopulationSampling biasSample size determinationEconometricsStatistics

MeSH terms

Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansCohort StudiesSelection BiasPatient Selection

Funding

  • Wellcome
  • Wellcome Trust
  • United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation
  • University of Bristol
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Citations
924
FWCI
43.84
field-weighted impact
References
41
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1989 · 17,494 citations
Why representativeness should be avoided
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2013 · 854 citations
Cohort Profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2012 · 2,695 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations · Scinovex