Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

BMJ · 2016 · Vol. 353 · pp. i2016–i2016
Pablo Alonso‐CoelloHolger J. SchünemannJenny MobergRomina Brignardello‐PetersenElie A. AklMarina DavoliShaun TreweekReem A. MustafaGabriel RadaSarah RosenbaumAngela MorelliGordon GuyattAndrew D Oxmanthe GRADE Working Group

Abstract

#### Summary points Healthcare decision making is complex. Decision-making processes and the factors (criteria) that decision makers should consider vary for different types of decisions, including clinical recommendations, coverage decisions, and health system or public health recommendations or decisions.1 2 3 4 However, some criteria are relevant for all of these decisions, including the anticipated effects of the options being considered, the certainty of the evidence for those effects (also referred to as quality of evidence or confidence in effect estimates), and the costs and feasibility of the options. Decision makers must make judgments about each relevant factor, informed by the best evidence that is available to them. Often, the processes that decision makers use, the criteria that they consider and the evidence that they …

Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare cost, quality, practicesCertaintyHealth careQuality (philosophy)Management scienceEvidence-based medicineClinical decision makingDecision analysisComputer scienceDecision qualityActuarial science

MeSH terms

Choice BehaviorDecision Support TechniquesDelivery of Health CareHumansEvidence-Based Medicine
Citations
1,276
FWCI
311.68
field-weighted impact
References
41
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.