Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2013 · Vol. 66(7) · pp. 719–725
Jeff AndrewsGordon GuyattAndrew D OxmanPhil AldersonPhilipp DahmYngve Falck–YtterMona NasserJoerg J MeerpohlPiet N. PostRegina KunzJan BrożekGunn Elisabeth VistDavid M. RindElie A. AklHolger J. Schünemann
Clinical practice guidelines implementationMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeGrading (engineering)GuidelinePresentation (obstetrics)Intervention (counseling)MedicineMedical educationPsychologyComputer scienceNursingEngineering

MeSH terms

Clinical ProtocolsHumansUnited StatesPractice Guidelines as TopicEvidence-Based Medicine
Citations
1,378
FWCI
75.34
field-weighted impact
References
40
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 2,800 citations
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 1,829 citations
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 1,885 citations
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 2,634 citations
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 2,330 citations
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10,137 citations
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 1,819 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.