Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

BMJ · 2008 · Vol. 336(7650) · pp. 924–926
Gordon GuyattAndrew D OxmanGunn Elisabeth VistRegina KunzYngve Falck–YtterPablo Alonso‐CoelloHolger J. Schünemann

Abstract

Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide

Clinical practice guidelines implementationMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeQuality of evidenceQuality (philosophy)Consensus conferenceComputer scienceEvidence-based medicineRating systemMedicineData scienceAlternative medicineMeta-analysis

MeSH terms

Decision MakingPractice Guidelines as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineQuality Indicators, Health CareConsensus
Citations
21,184
FWCI
248.34
field-weighted impact
References
12
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.