Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Dietary Fat and Coronary Heart Disease: A Comparison of Approaches for Adjusting for Total Energy Intake and Modeling Repeated Dietary Measurements

American Journal of Epidemiology · 1999 · Vol. 149(6) · pp. 531–540
F. B. HuM. J. StampferEric B. RimmAlberto AscherioB. A. RosnerD SpiegelmanW. C. Willett

Abstract

Previous cohort studies of fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) have been inconsistent, probably due in part to methodological differences and various limitations, including inadequate dietary assessment and incomplete adjustment for total energy intake. The authors analyzed repeated assessment of diet from the Nurses' Health Study to examine the associations between intakes of four major types of fat (saturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, and trans fats) and risk of CHD during 14 years of follow-up (1980-1994) by using alternative methods for energy adjustment. In particular, the authors compared four risk models for energy adjustment: the standard multivariate model, the energy-partition model, the nutrient residual model, and the multivariate nutrient density model. Within each model, the authors compared four different approaches for analyzing repeated dietary measurements: baseline diet only, the most recent diet, and two different algorithms for calculating cumulative average diets. The substantive results were consistent across all models; that is, higher intakes of saturated and trans fats were associated with increased risk of CHD, while higher intakes of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats were associated with reduced risk. When nutrients were considered as continuous variables, the four energy-adjustment methods yielded similar associationS. However, the interpretation of the relative risks differed across models. In addition, within each model, the methods using the cumulative averages in general yielded stronger associations than did those using either only baseline diet or the most recent diet. When the nutrients were categorized according to quintiles, the residual and the nutrient density models, which gave similar results, yielded statistically more significant tests for linear trend than did the standard and the partition models.

Nutritional Studies and DietObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiet and metabolism studiesPolyunsaturated fatNutrientMedicineMultivariate statisticsSaturated fatCoronary heart diseaseNutritional epidemiologyNutrient densityConfidence intervalEnvironmental health

MeSH terms

AdultEnergy IntakeCoronary DiseaseData Interpretation, StatisticalDietary FatsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRiskModels, StatisticalCohort StudiesNutrition Assessment
Citations
1,092
FWCI
22.96
field-weighted impact
References
28
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Risk of Major Chronic Disease
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2004 · 1,323 citations
References
Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 1997 · 3,700 citations
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1989 · 17,494 citations
REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF A SEMIQUANTITATIVE FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE
American Journal of Epidemiology · 1985 · 4,288 citations
RE: “TOTAL ENERGY INTAKE: IMPLICATIONS FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES”
American Journal of Epidemiology · 1991 · 2,725 citations
Cardiovascular Survey Methods.
Annals of Internal Medicine · 1968 · 3,072 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.