Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 10% cited

Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill

Critical Care · 2010 · Vol. 14(2) · pp. 207–207
Jean‐Louis VincentRui P. Moreno

Abstract

General illness severity scores are widely used in the ICU to predict outcome, characterize disease severity and degree of organ dysfunction, and assess resource use. In this article we review the most commonly used scoring systems in each of these three groups. We examine the history of the development of the initial major systems in each group, discuss the construction of subsequent versions, and, when available, provide recent comparative data regarding their performance. Importantly, the different types of scores should be seen as complementary, rather than competitive and mutually exclusive. It is possible that their combined use could provide a more accurate indication of disease severity and prognosis. All these scoring systems will need to be updated with time as ICU populations change and new diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic techniques become available.

Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesMedicineCritically illIntensive care medicineCritical illnessDiseaseOrgan systemSeverity of illnessScoring systemPathologyInternal medicine

MeSH terms

HumansIntensive Care UnitsSeverity of Illness IndexCritical Illness
Citations
623
FWCI
11.01
field-weighted impact
References
74
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill
Critical Care · 2010 · 623 citations
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill · Scinovex