Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Pazopanib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2010 · Vol. 28(6) · pp. 1061–1068
Cora N. SternbergIan D. DavisJozef MardiakCezary SzczylikEunsik LeeJohn WagstaffCarlos H. BarriosPamela SalmanOleg GladkovAlexander KavinaJuan José ZarbáChen MeiLauren McCannLini PanditeDebasish RoychowdhuryRobert E. Hawkins

Abstract

PURPOSE Pazopanib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluated efficacy and safety of pazopanib monotherapy in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients with measurable, locally advanced, and/or metastatic RCC were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive oral pazopanib or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, tumor response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), and safety. Radiographic assessments of tumors were independently reviewed. Results Of 435 patients enrolled, 233 were treatment naive (54%) and 202 were cytokine pretreated (46%). PFS was significantly prolonged with pazopanib compared with placebo in the overall study population (median, PFS 9.2 v 4.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.62; P < .0001), the treatment-naive subpopulation (median PFS 11.1 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.60; P < .0001), and the cytokine-pretreated subpopulation (median PFS, 7.4 v 4.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; P < .001). The objective response rate was 30% with pazopanib compared with 3% with placebo (P < .001). The median duration of response was longer than 1 year. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, hypertension, hair color changes, nausea, anorexia, and vomiting. There was no evidence of clinically important differences in quality of life for pazopanib versus placebo. CONCLUSION Pazopanib demonstrated significant improvement in PFS and tumor response compared with placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic RCC.

Renal cell carcinoma treatmentRenal and related cancersCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsMedicinePazopanibInternal medicineRenal cell carcinomaClinical endpointHazard ratioPlaceboAdverse effectOncologyResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

MeSH terms

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndazolesInternational AgenciesKidney NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle Aged
Citations
2,472
FWCI
181.35
field-weighted impact
References
27
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1998 · 2,890 citations
A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity
Nature Biotechnology · 2008 · 2,427 citations
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2000 · 15,689 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.