Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies
Abstract
During the past decades, anticancer immunotherapy has evolved from a promising therapeutic option to a robust clinical reality. Many immunotherapeutic regimens are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for use in cancer patients, and many others are being investigated as standalone therapeutic interventions or combined with conventional treatments in clinical studies. Immunotherapies may be subdivided into "passive" and "active" based on their ability to engage the host immune system against cancer. Since the anticancer activity of most passive immunotherapeutics (including tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies) also relies on the host immune system, this classification does not properly reflect the complexity of the drug-host-tumor interaction. Alternatively, anticancer immunotherapeutics can be classified according to their antigen specificity. While some immunotherapies specifically target one (or a few) defined tumor-associated antigen(s), others operate in a relatively non-specific manner and boost natural or therapy-elicited anticancer immune responses of unknown and often broad specificity. Here, we propose a critical, integrated classification of anticancer immunotherapies and discuss the clinical relevance of these approaches.
MeSH terms
Funding
- Cancer Research Institute
- Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
- Susan G. Komen
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
- European Commission
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
- Ministero della Salute
- Ligue Contre le Cancer
- Fondation de France
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
- Institut National Du Cancer
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Labex Immuno-Oncology
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
