Scinovex
reviewTop 10% cited

Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies

International Journal of Epidemiology · 2011 · Vol. 40(3) · pp. 755–764
Stephen BurgessSimon G. Thompson

Abstract

Weak instrument bias is of practical importance for the design and analysis of Mendelian randomization studies. Post hoc choice of instruments, genetic models or data based on measured F-statistics can exacerbate bias. In particular, the commonly cited rule of thumb that F > 10 avoids bias in IV analysis is misleading.

Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMendelian randomizationObservational studyPoolingStatisticsStatisticCovariateEconometricsType I and type II errorsInstrumental variableStandard error

MeSH terms

Data Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleRandom AllocationSensitivity and SpecificityGenetic VariationBiasConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMendelian Randomization Analysis
Citations
4,042
FWCI
6.60
field-weighted impact
References
41
Percentile
97%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1989 · 17,494 citations
Estimation and Inference in Econometrics.
The Economic Journal · 1994 · 5,592 citations
Inflammation, Atherosclerosis, and Coronary Artery Disease
New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 8,682 citations
Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2004 · 1,275 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.