review Open Access
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Vol. 4(8) · pp. CD004667–CD004667
Jane Sandall✉Hora Soltani(Sheffield Hallam University)Simon Gates(University of Warwick)Andrew Shennan(King's College London)Declan Devane(Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway)
Abstract
Most women should be offered midwife-led continuity models of care and women should be encouraged to ask for this option although caution should be exercised in applying this advice to women with substantial medical or obstetric complications.
Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsNursing Roles and PracticesAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementMedicineRelative riskChildbirthConfidence intervalAttendanceObstetricsPregnancyPsychosocialEpisiotomyContinuity of care
MeSH terms
Cesarean SectionContinuity of Patient CareEpisiotomyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMidwiferyPostnatal CarePregnancyPrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesia, ObstetricalPatient SatisfactionModels, Organizational
Citations
1,239
FWCI
—
field-weighted impact
References
111
Percentile
—
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · 1,239 citations
References
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review
BMJ · 2003 · 2,326 citations
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · 1,239 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.