Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Loss of E-Cadherin Promotes Metastasis via Multiple Downstream Transcriptional Pathways

Cancer Research · 2008 · Vol. 68(10) · pp. 3645–3654
Tamer T. ÖnderPiyush B. GuptaSendurai A. ManiJing YangEric S. LanderRobert A. Weinberg

Abstract

Loss of the epithelial adhesion molecule E-cadherin is thought to enable metastasis by disrupting intercellular contacts-an early step in metastatic dissemination. To further investigate the molecular basis of this notion, we use two methods to inhibit E-cadherin function that distinguish between E-cadherin's cell-cell adhesion and intracellular signaling functions. Whereas the disruption of cell-cell contacts alone does not enable metastasis, the loss of E-cadherin protein does, through induction of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, invasiveness, and anoikis resistance. We find the E-cadherin binding partner beta-catenin to be necessary, but not sufficient, for induction of these phenotypes. In addition, gene expression analysis shows that E-cadherin loss results in the induction of multiple transcription factors, at least one of which, Twist, is necessary for E-cadherin loss-induced metastasis. These findings indicate that E-cadherin loss in tumors contributes to metastatic dissemination by inducing wide-ranging transcriptional and functional changes.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerCancer Cells and MetastasisCancer-related gene regulationCadherinAnoikisMetastasisTranscription factorBiologyCell biologyIntracellularCell adhesionPhenotypeCell adhesion molecule

MeSH terms

AnimalsCell CommunicationHumansMice, NudeModels, BiologicalNeoplasm MetastasisTranscription, GeneticSignal TransductionCadherinsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMice, SCIDMice, Inbred NODGene Expression ProfilingMiceTwist-Related Protein 1

Funding

  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Broad Institute
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Ludwig Center at Harvard
Citations
1,509
FWCI
28.83
field-weighted impact
References
42
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.