Scinovex
reviewTop 1% cited

Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2008 · Vol. 41(1) · pp. 3–12
Will G. HopkinsStephen W. MarshallAlan M. BatterhamJuri Hanin

Abstract

Statistical guidelines and expert statements are now available to assist in the analysis and reporting of studies in some biomedical disciplines. We present here a more progressive resource for sample-based studies, meta-analyses, and case studies in sports medicine and exercise science. We offer forthright advice on the following controversial or novel issues: using precision of estimation for inferences about population effects in preference to null-hypothesis testing, which is inadequate for assessing clinical or practical importance; justifying sample size via acceptable precision or confidence for clinical decisions rather than via adequate power for statistical significance; showing SD rather than SEM, to better communicate the magnitude of differences in means and nonuniformity of error; avoiding purely nonparametric analyses, which cannot provide inferences about magnitude and are unnecessary; using regression statistics in validity studies, in preference to the impractical and biased limits of agreement; making greater use of qualitative methods to enrich sample-based quantitative projects; and seeking ethics approval for public access to the depersonalized raw data of a study, to address the need for more scrutiny of research and better meta-analyses. Advice on less contentious issues includes the following: using covariates in linear models to adjust for confounders, to account for individual differences, and to identify potential mechanisms of an effect; using log transformation to deal with nonuniformity of effects and error; identifying and deleting outliers; presenting descriptive, effect, and inferential statistics in appropriate formats; and contending with bias arising from problems with sampling, assignment, blinding, measurement error, and researchers' prejudices. This article should advance the field by stimulating debate, promoting innovative approaches, and serving as a useful checklist for authors, reviewers, and editors.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsSports Performance and TrainingReliability and Agreement in MeasurementSample size determinationCovariateStatisticsSample (material)Statistical inferenceScrutinyPopulationDescriptive statisticsNonparametric statisticsStatistical power

MeSH terms

Data Interpretation, StatisticalHumansResearch DesignSports MedicineExerciseSample SizeBiomedical Research
Citations
8,767
FWCI
62.02
field-weighted impact
References
31
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.