Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Ultrafast Approximation for Phylogenetic Bootstrap

Molecular Biology and Evolution · 2013 · Vol. 30(5) · pp. 1188–1195
Bùi Quang MinhMinh Anh NguyenA. von Haeseler

Abstract

Nonparametric bootstrap has been a widely used tool in phylogenetic analysis to assess the clade support of phylogenetic trees. However, with the rapidly growing amount of data, this task remains a computational bottleneck. Recently, approximation methods such as the RAxML rapid bootstrap (RBS) and the Shimodaira-Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test have been introduced to speed up the bootstrap. Here, we suggest an ultrafast bootstrap approximation approach (UFBoot) to compute the support of phylogenetic groups in maximum likelihood (ML) based trees. To achieve this, we combine the resampling estimated log-likelihood method with a simple but effective collection scheme of candidate trees. We also propose a stopping rule that assesses the convergence of branch support values to automatically determine when to stop collecting candidate trees. UFBoot achieves a median speed up of 3.1 (range: 0.66-33.3) to 10.2 (range: 1.32-41.4) compared with RAxML RBS for real DNA and amino acid alignments, respectively. Moreover, our extensive simulations show that UFBoot is robust against moderate model violations and the support values obtained appear to be relatively unbiased compared with the conservative standard bootstrap. This provides a more direct interpretation of the bootstrap support. We offer an efficient and easy-to-use software (available at http://www.cibiv.at/software/iqtree) to perform the UFBoot analysis with ML tree inference.

Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesGenetic diversity and population structurePhylogenetic treeResamplingBiologyRange (aeronautics)BottleneckTree (set theory)StatisticsInferenceMathematicsAlgorithm

MeSH terms

Computer SimulationPhylogenyLikelihood Functions

Funding

  • Austrian Science Fund
Citations
4,803
FWCI
19.58
field-weighted impact
References
54
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Related articles
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.