Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Approximate Likelihood-Ratio Test for Branches: A Fast, Accurate, and Powerful Alternative

Systematic Biology · 2006 · Vol. 55(4) · pp. 539–552
Maria AnisimovaOlivier Gascuel

Abstract

We revisit statistical tests for branches of evolutionary trees reconstructed upon molecular data. A new, fast, approximate likelihood-ratio test (aLRT) for branches is presented here as a competitive alternative to nonparametric bootstrap and Bayesian estimation of branch support. The aLRT is based on the idea of the conventional LRT, with the null hypothesis corresponding to the assumption that the inferred branch has length 0. We show that the LRT statistic is asymptotically distributed as a maximum of three random variables drawn from the chi(0)2 + chi(1)2 distribution. The new aLRT of interior branch uses this distribution for significance testing, but the test statistic is approximated in a slightly conservative but practical way as 2(l1- l2), i.e., double the difference between the maximum log-likelihood values corresponding to the best tree and the second best topological arrangement around the branch of interest. Such a test is fast because the log-likelihood value l2 is computed by optimizing only over the branch of interest and the four adjacent branches, whereas other parameters are fixed at their optimal values corresponding to the best ML tree. The performance of the new test was studied on simulated 4-, 12-, and 100-taxon data sets with sequences of different lengths. The aLRT is shown to be accurate, powerful, and robust to certain violations of model assumptions. The aLRT is implemented within the algorithm used by the recent fast maximum likelihood tree estimation program PHYML (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003).

Genetic diversity and population structureGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMathematicsLikelihood-ratio testStatisticsTree (set theory)AlgorithmTest statisticStatistical hypothesis testingNonparametric statisticsCombinatorics

MeSH terms

ClassificationComputer SimulationPhylogenyModels, StatisticalLikelihood Functions
Citations
2,710
FWCI
27.15
field-weighted impact
References
66
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.