review Open AccessTop 1% cited
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2009 · Vol. 2010(1) · pp. MR000008–MR000008
Phil Edwards✉(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)Ian Roberts(Cochrane)Mary Clarke(Cochrane)Carolyn DiGuiseppi(Colorado School of Public Health)Reinhard Wentz(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital)Irene Kwan(Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists)Rachel Cooper(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)Lambert Felix(University of London)Sarah Pratap
Abstract
Health researchers using postal and electronic questionnaires can increase response using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.
Survey Methodology and NonresponseBehavioral Health and InterventionsHealth disparities and outcomesFunnel plotMedicinePublication biasConfidence intervalOdds ratioRandom effects modelMeta-analysisSample size determinationClinical trialOdds
MeSH terms
Surveys and QuestionnairesRewardCorrespondence as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReminder SystemsElectronic Mail
Citations
1,407
FWCI
213.48
field-weighted impact
References
554
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open · 2013 · 656 citations
References
Profit and loss analysis for an intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan: a tool for strategic management
BMC Health Services Research · 2006 · 322 citations
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
JAMA · 1995 · 5,583 citations
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review
BMJ · 2002 · 1,935 citations
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
BMJ · 1997 · 55,187 citations
Empirical Evidence of Bias
JAMA · 1995 · 5,518 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.