Scinovex
article Open Access

Menstrual regulation and Contraceptive

Ashikujaman Syed

Abstract

Women in the China and U.S. have access to various hormonal contraceptive methods that can regulate menstruation. This study examined the attitudes and perceptions of reproductive-aged women toward contraceptive methods, including how menstrual regulation and suppression preferences influenced contraceptive choice. Data collection used a mixed-methods approach, including 6 focus groups (n = 61), individual interviews (n = 18), and a web-based survey (n = 547). Participants described contraceptive method preferences that allowed monthly bleeding and daily control, expressing concerns about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) because of decreased user involvement. Some participants noted LARC improved their menstrual control. Many participants felt menstruation was healthy, whereas suppression was abnormal and resulted in negative health outcomes. Though participants indicated LARC as beneficial (M = 4.99 ± 1.66), convenient (M = 5.43 ± 1.68), and healthy (M = 4.62 ± 1.69), they chose combined oral contraceptives due to convenience.

Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMenstrual Health and DisordersLong-acting reversible contraceptionMenstruationMedicineHormonal contraceptionFamily planningGynecologyIntrauterine deviceMenstrual bleedingFamily medicinePopulation
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
46%
vs. same field & year
Related articles
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2010 · 666 citations
Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2011 · 558 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.