article Open AccessTop 1% cited
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2010 · Vol. 203(2) · pp. 115.e1–115.e7
Gina M. Secura✉(Washington University in St. Louis)Jenifer E. Allsworth(Washington University in St. Louis)Tessa Madden(Washington University in St. Louis)Jennifer L. Mullersman(Washington University in St. Louis)Jeffrey F. Peipert(Washington University in St. Louis)
Reproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMedicineLong-acting reversible contraceptionIntrauterine deviceFamily planningContraceptive implantObstetricsGynecologyHormonal contraceptionDeveloped countryPopulation
MeSH terms
AdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCost-Benefit AnalysisDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPregnancy
Citations
666
FWCI
31.28
field-weighted impact
References
19
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2011 · 558 citations
References
A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data
American Journal of Epidemiology · 2004 · 9,254 citations
Related articles
Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2011 · 558 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.