Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Evaluating Trauma Care

Carl BoydMary Ann TolsonWayne S. Copes

Abstract

Evaluation of trauma care must be an integral part of any system designed for care of seriously injured patients. However, outcome review should offer comparability to national standards or norms. The TRISS method offers a standard approach for evaluating outcome of trauma care. Anatomic, physiologic, and age characteristics are used to quantify probability of survival as related to severity of injury. TRISS offers a means of case identification for quality assurance review on a local basis, as well as a means of comparison of outcome for different populations of trauma patients. Methods for calculating statistics associated with TRISS are presented. The Z and M statistics are explained with the nonstatistician in mind. We feel this article is a source for those interested in developing or upgrading trauma care evaluation.

Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesHip and Femur FracturesAbdominal Trauma and InjuriesComparabilityTrauma careOutcome (game theory)Quality assuranceMedicineIdentification (biology)Medical emergencyQuality (philosophy)Standard of careEmergency medicine
Citations
1,798
FWCI
24.07
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Evaluating Trauma Care · Scinovex