Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · 2022 · Vol. 29(11) · pp. 1056–1067
Mehmet AkdelDouglas E. V. PiresEduard Porta‐PardoJürgen JänesArthur O. ZalevskyBálint MészárosPatrick BryantLydia L. GoodRoman A. LaskowskiGabriele PozzatiAditi ShenoyWensi ZhuPetras J. KundrotasVictoria Ruiz‐SerraCarlos H. M. RodriguesAlistair S. DunhamDavid F. BurkeNeera BorkakotiSameer VelankarAdam FrostJ. BasquinKresten Lindorff‐LarsenAlex BatemanAndrey V. KajavaAlfonso ValenciaSergey OvchinnikovJanani DurairajDavid B. AscherJanet M. ThorntonNorman E. DaveyAmelie SteinArne ElofssonTristan I. CrollPedro Beltrão

Abstract

Most proteins fold into 3D structures that determine how they function and orchestrate the biological processes of the cell. Recent developments in computational methods for protein structure predictions have reached the accuracy of experimentally determined models. Although this has been independently verified, the implementation of these methods across structural-biology applications remains to be tested. Here, we evaluate the use of AlphaFold2 (AF2) predictions in the study of characteristic structural elements; the impact of missense variants; function and ligand binding site predictions; modeling of interactions; and modeling of experimental structural data. For 11 proteomes, an average of 25% additional residues can be confidently modeled when compared with homology modeling, identifying structural features rarely seen in the Protein Data Bank. AF2-based predictions of protein disorder and complexes surpass dedicated tools, and AF2 models can be used across diverse applications equally well compared with experimentally determined structures, when the confidence metrics are critically considered. In summary, we find that these advances are likely to have a transformative impact in structural biology and broader life-science research.

Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsEnzyme Structure and FunctionStructural biologyComputational biologyBiologyChemistryCell biology

MeSH terms

Binding SitesFurylfuramideProtein ConformationProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, Protein

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • Simons Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Swedish e-Science Research Centre
  • European Commission
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • Lundbeckfonden
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • State Government of Victoria
  • Russian Science Foundation
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
  • ETH Zürich Foundation
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Helmut Horten Stiftung
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Citations
674
FWCI
56.24
field-weighted impact
References
90
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints
Journal of Molecular Biology · 1993 · 13,125 citations
Prediction of protein stability changes for single‐site mutations using support vector machines
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2005 · 1,175 citations
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2004 · 47,120 citations
<i>Phaser</i>crystallographic software
Journal of Applied Crystallography · 2007 · 20,684 citations
Array programming with NumPy
Nature · 2020 · 20,904 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.