Scinovex
article Open Access

Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer

Genome Research · 2018 · Vol. 28(11) · pp. 1747–1756
Anand MayakondaDe‐Chen LinYassen AssenovChristoph PlassH. Phillip Koeffler

Abstract

Numerous large-scale genomic studies of matched tumor-normal samples have established the somatic landscapes of most cancer types. However, the downstream analysis of data from somatic mutations entails a number of computational and statistical approaches, requiring usage of independent software and numerous tools. Here, we describe an R Bioconductor package, Maftools, which offers a multitude of analysis and visualization modules that are commonly used in cancer genomic studies, including driver gene identification, pathway, signature, enrichment, and association analyses. Maftools only requires somatic variants in Mutation Annotation Format (MAF) and is independent of larger alignment files. With the implementation of well-established statistical and computational methods, Maftools facilitates data-driven research and comparative analysis to discover novel results from publicly available data sets. In the present study, using three of the well-annotated cohorts from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we describe the application of Maftools to reproduce known results. More importantly, we show that Maftools can also be used to uncover novel findings through integrative analysis.

Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGene expression and cancer classificationEpigenetics and DNA MethylationBioconductorBiologyComputational biologySomatic cellAnnotationGenomeVisualizationIdentification (biology)GeneticsBioinformatics

MeSH terms

HumansNeoplasmsSoftwareSequence Analysis, DNAMutation RateClonal Evolution

Funding

  • DeGregorio Family Foundation
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Price Family Foundation
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation Singapore
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
  • Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore
Citations
5,307
FWCI
field-weighted impact
References
64
Percentile
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.