Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks

Neurocomputing · 2019 · Vol. 338 · pp. 34–45
Guotai WangWenqi LiMichaël AertsenJan DeprestSébastien OurselinTom Vercauteren

Abstract

Despite the state-of-the-art performance for medical image segmentation, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have rarely provided uncertainty estimations regarding their segmentation outputs, e.g., model (<i>epistemic</i>) and image-based (<i>aleatoric</i>) uncertainties. In this work, we analyze these different types of uncertainties for CNN-based 2D and 3D medical image segmentation tasks at both pixel level and structure level. We additionally propose a test-time augmentation-based <i>aleatoric</i> uncertainty to analyze the effect of different transformations of the input image on the segmentation output. Test-time augmentation has been previously used to improve segmentation accuracy, yet not been formulated in a consistent mathematical framework. Hence, we also propose a theoretical formulation of test-time augmentation, where a distribution of the prediction is estimated by Monte Carlo simulation with prior distributions of parameters in an image acquisition model that involves image transformations and noise. We compare and combine our proposed <i>aleatoric</i> uncertainty with model uncertainty. Experiments with segmentation of fetal brains and brain tumors from 2D and 3D Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) showed that 1) the test-time augmentation-based <i>aleatoric</i> uncertainty provides a better uncertainty estimation than calculating the test-time dropout-based model uncertainty alone and helps to reduce overconfident incorrect predictions, and 2) our test-time augmentation outperforms a single-prediction baseline and dropout-based multiple predictions.

Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)EstimationImage (mathematics)SegmentationArtificial neural networkMachine learningImage segmentation

Funding

  • Wellcome
  • Nvidia
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Royal Society
  • University College London
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Centre For Medical Engineering, King’s College London
Citations
620
FWCI
27.80
field-weighted impact
References
80
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2014 · 6,268 citations
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
International Journal of Computer Vision · 2015 · 39,683 citations
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Communications of the ACM · 2017 · 75,550 citations
Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2016 · 10,957 citations
Interactive Medical Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning With Image-Specific Fine Tuning
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2018 · 848 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.