Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2014 · Vol. 34(10) · pp. 1993–2024
Bjoern MenzeAndrás JakabStefan BauerJayashree Kalpathy–CramerKeyvan FarahaniJustin KirbyYuliya BurrenNicole PorzJohannes SlotboomRoland WiestLevente LáncziElizabeth R. GerstnerMarc‐André WeberTal ArbelBrian AvantsNicholas AyachePatricia BuendiaD. Louis CollinsNicolas CordierJason J. CorsoAntonio CriminisiTilak DasHervé DelingetteÇağatay DemiralpChristopher R. DurstMichel DojatSenan DoyleJoana FestaFlorence ForbesEzequiel GeremiaBen GlockerPolina GollandXiaotao GuoAndaç HamamcıKhan M. IftekharuddinR. JenaNigel JohnEnder KonukoğluDanial LashkariJosé MarizRaphael MeierSérgio PereiraDoina PrecupStephen J. PriceTammy Riklin RavivSyed M. S. RezaMichael J. RyanDuygu SarıkayaLawrence H. SchwartzHoo-Chang ShinJamie ShottonCarlos A. SilvaNuno SousaNagesh K. SubbannaGábor SzékelyThomas J. TaylorOwen ThomasNicholas J. TustisonGözde ÜnalFlor VasseurMax WintermarkDong Hye YeLiang ZhaoBinsheng ZhaoDarko ZikicMarcel PrastawaMauricio ReyesKoen Van Leemput

Abstract

In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low- and high-grade glioma patients-manually annotated by up to four raters-and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74%-85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all sub-regions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.

Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationAI in cancer detectionArtificial intelligenceImage segmentationBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Brain tumorSegmentationMedical imaging

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBenchmarkingNeuroimaging

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • European Commission
  • Academy of Finland
  • Tekes
  • Lundbeckfonden
  • Krebsliga Schweiz
  • Technische Universität München
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  • National Center for Research Resources
Citations
6,268
FWCI
87.22
field-weighted impact
References
156
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
A comparative study of machine learning algorithms to detect the brain tumor
International Journal of Computing Programming and Database Management · 2020 · 0 citations
CE-Net: Context Encoder Network for 2D Medical Image Segmentation
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2019 · 2,134 citations
Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2016 · 2,615 citations
References
Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials using Three-dimensional Textons
International Journal of Computer Vision · 2001 · 1,485 citations
On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 1986 · 4,213 citations
Whole Brain Segmentation
Neuron · 2002 · 8,910 citations
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the <i>EM</i> Algorithm
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 1977 · 49,286 citations
SUSAN—A New Approach to Low Level Image Processing
International Journal of Computer Vision · 1997 · 3,315 citations
What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts?
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2004 · 3,136 citations
&lt;title&gt;Rapid Texture Identification&lt;/title&gt;
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 1980 · 543 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.