Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process

BMJ · 2017 · Vol. 359 · pp. j4891–j4891
Glyn ElwynMarie‐Anne DurandJulia SongJohanna W. M. AartsPaul BarrZackary BergerNan CochranDominick L. FroschDariusz GalasińskiPål GulbrandsenPaul K. J. HanMartin HärterPaul KinnersleyAmy LloydManish MishraLilisbeth Perestelo‐PérezIsabelle SchollKounosuke TomoriLyndal TrevenaHolly O. WittemanTrudy van der Weijden

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b> To revise an existing three-talk model for learning how to achieve shared decision making, and to consult with relevant stakeholders to update and obtain wider engagement.<b>Design</b> Multistage consultation process.<b>Setting</b> Key informant group, communities of interest, and survey of clinical specialties.<b>Participants</b> 19 key informants, 153 member responses from multiple communities of interest, and 316 responses to an online survey from medically qualified clinicians from six specialties.<b>Results</b> After extended consultation over three iterations, we revised the three-talk model by making changes to one talk category, adding the need to elicit patient goals, providing a clear set of tasks for each talk category, and adding suggested scripts to illustrate each step. A new three-talk model of shared decision making is proposed, based on "team talk," "option talk," and "decision talk," to depict a process of collaboration and deliberation. Team talk places emphasis on the need to provide support to patients when they are made aware of choices, and to elicit their goals as a means of guiding decision making processes. Option talk refers to the task of comparing alternatives, using risk communication principles. Decision talk refers to the task of arriving at decisions that reflect the informed preferences of patients, guided by the experience and expertise of health professionals.<b>Conclusions</b> The revised three-talk model of shared decision making depicts conversational steps, initiated by providing support when introducing options, followed by strategies to compare and discuss trade-offs, before deliberation based on informed preferences.

Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDeliberationTask (project management)Set (abstract data type)Process (computing)Key (lock)Computer sciencePsychologyScripting languageGroup decision-makingKnowledge management

MeSH terms

Clinical Decision-MakingCommunicationDecision MakingHumansModels, TheoreticalPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and Consultation

Funding

  • Dartmouth College
Citations
983
FWCI
115.22
field-weighted impact
References
42
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · 6,580 citations
Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2012 · 4,100 citations
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · 1,512 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process · Scinovex