Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Vol. 2017(4) · pp. CD001431–CD001431
Dawn StaceyFrance LégaréKrystina B. LewisMichael J. BarryCarol BennettKaren EdenMargaret Holmes‐RovnerHilary A. Llewellyn‐ThomasAnne LyddiattRichard ThomsonLyndal Trevena

Abstract

Compared to usual care across a wide variety of decision contexts, people exposed to decision aids feel more knowledgeable, better informed, and clearer about their values, and they probably have a more active role in decision making and more accurate risk perceptions. There is growing evidence that decision aids may improve values-congruent choices. There are no adverse effects on health outcomes or satisfaction. New for this updated is evidence indicating improved knowledge and accurate risk perceptions when decision aids are used either within or in preparation for the consultation. Further research is needed on the effects on adherence with the chosen option, cost-effectiveness, and use with lower literacy populations.

MeSH terms

Conservative TreatmentCommunicationDecision Support TechniquesHumansHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicElective Surgical ProceduresPublication Bias
Citations
6,580
FWCI
918.34
field-weighted impact
References
607
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.