review Open AccessTop 1% cited
Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature
BMJ Open · 2017 · Vol. 7(1) · pp. e012332–e012332
Samuel Franzen✉(Oxford Policy Management)Clare Chandler(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)Trudie Lang
Abstract
There has been steady progress in LMIC health research capacity, but major barriers to research persist and more empirical evidence on development strategies is required. Despite an evolution in development thinking, international actors continue to use outdated development models that are recognised as ineffective. To realise newer development thinking, research capacity outcomes need to be equally valued as research outputs. While some development actors are now adopting this dedicated capacity development approach, they are in the minority.
Global Health and SurgeryEthics in Clinical ResearchHealth and Medical Research ImpactsMedicineExcellenceGrey literatureCapacity buildingSystematic reviewNarrativeLow and middle income countriesEmpirical researchStrengths and weaknessesPublic relations
MeSH terms
Developing CountriesHumansResearchQualitative ResearchCapacity Building
Funding
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Citations
394
FWCI
24.06
field-weighted impact
References
135
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review
Social Science & Medicine · 2005 · 884 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
