Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature

BMJ Open · 2017 · Vol. 7(1) · pp. e012332–e012332
Samuel FranzenClare ChandlerTrudie Lang

Abstract

There has been steady progress in LMIC health research capacity, but major barriers to research persist and more empirical evidence on development strategies is required. Despite an evolution in development thinking, international actors continue to use outdated development models that are recognised as ineffective. To realise newer development thinking, research capacity outcomes need to be equally valued as research outputs. While some development actors are now adopting this dedicated capacity development approach, they are in the minority.

Global Health and SurgeryEthics in Clinical ResearchHealth and Medical Research ImpactsMedicineExcellenceGrey literatureCapacity buildingSystematic reviewNarrativeLow and middle income countriesEmpirical researchStrengths and weaknessesPublic relations

MeSH terms

Developing CountriesHumansResearchQualitative ResearchCapacity Building

Funding

  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Health research capacity development in low and middle income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature · Scinovex