Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Is Dengue Vector Control Deficient in Effectiveness or Evidence?: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016 · Vol. 10(3) · pp. e0004551–e0004551
Leigh BowmanSarah DoneganPhilip J. McCall

Abstract

This review and meta-analysis demonstrate the remarkable paucity of reliable evidence for the effectiveness of any dengue vector control method. Standardised studies of higher quality to evaluate and compare methods must be prioritised to optimise cost-effective dengue prevention.

Mosquito-borne diseases and controlMalaria Research and ControlViral Infections and VectorsDengue feverMedicineMeta-analysisDengue virusRandomized controlled trialArbovirusIncidence (geometry)Systematic reviewEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

MeSH terms

AedesAnimalsDengueHealth Services ResearchMosquito ControlIncidence

Funding

  • European Commission
  • Medical Research Council
Citations
437
FWCI
43.27
field-weighted impact
References
135
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
A Critical Assessment of Vector Control for Dengue Prevention
PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015 · 445 citations
Economic and Disease Burden of Dengue in Southeast Asia
PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2013 · 472 citations
Dengue: a continuing global threat
Nature Reviews Microbiology · 2010 · 2,044 citations
The Role of Human Movement in the Transmission of Vector-Borne Pathogens
PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2009 · 573 citations
The Epidemiology of Dengue in the Americas Over the Last Three Decades: A Worrisome Reality
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2010 · 542 citations
The global distribution and burden of dengue
Nature · 2013 · 9,995 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.