reviewTop 1% cited
Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2016 · Vol. 116(2) · pp. 184–190.e12
Konstantinos Chochlidakis✉(University of Rochester Medical Center)Panos Papaspyridakos(Tufts University)Alessandro GeminianiChun‐Jung Chen(Chi Mei Medical Center)I‐Jung Feng(Chi Mei Medical Center)Carlo Ercoli(University of Rochester)
Dental materials and restorationsDental Research and COVID-19Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesFixed prosthodonticsMeta-analysisProsthodonticsOrthodonticsPsychologyDentistryComputer scienceMedicineInternal medicine
MeSH terms
Dental Impression TechniqueDental Restoration, PermanentHumansProsthodonticsComputer-Aided DesignDental ProsthesisDental Marginal Adaptation
Citations
364
FWCI
26.29
field-weighted impact
References
44
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Marginal fit of gold inlay castings
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 1966 · 428 citations
A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2014 · 326 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
BMJ · 2009 · 82,871 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
PLoS Medicine · 2009 · 63,014 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.