articleTop 1% cited
A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2014 · Vol. 112(3) · pp. 555–560
Jonathan Ng(University of British Columbia)N. Dorin Ruse(University of British Columbia)Chris Wyatt✉(University of British Columbia)
Dental materials and restorationsDental Research and COVID-19Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesCrown (dentistry)Materials sciencePremolarLithium disilicateCeramicCubic zirconia3D printingEngineering drawingComputer scienceOrthodontics
MeSH terms
AlginatesBicuspidCalcium SulfateCeramicsCrownsDental Impression MaterialsDental Impression TechniqueDental MaterialsDental PorcelainHumansPhotographyPolyvinylsSiloxanesSurface PropertiesYttrium
Citations
326
FWCI
24.65
field-weighted impact
References
50
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2015 · 450 citations
Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2016 · 364 citations
References
Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2013 · 591 citations
Considerations in measurement of marginal fit
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 1989 · 744 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.