Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Concentrations of antibiotics predicted to select for resistant bacteria: Proposed limits for environmental regulation

Environment International · 2015 · Vol. 86 · pp. 140–149
Johan Bengtsson‐PalmeD. G. Joakim Larsson

Abstract

There are concerns that selection pressure from antibiotics in the environment may accelerate the evolution and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Nevertheless, there is currently no regulatory system that takes such risks into account. In part, this is due to limited knowledge of environmental concentrations that might exert selection for resistant bacteria. To experimentally determine minimal selective concentrations in complex microbial ecosystems for all antibiotics would involve considerable effort. In this work, our aim was to estimate upper boundaries for selective concentrations for all common antibiotics, based on the assumption that selective concentrations a priori need to be lower than those completely inhibiting growth. Data on Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) were obtained for 111 antibiotics from the public EUCAST database. The 1% lowest observed MICs were identified, and to compensate for limited species coverage, predicted lowest MICs adjusted for the number of tested species were extrapolated through modeling. Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs) for resistance selection were then assessed using an assessment factor of 10 to account for differences between MICs and minimal selective concentrations. The resulting PNECs ranged from 8 ng/L to 64 μg/L. Furthermore, the link between taxonomic similarity between species and lowest MIC was weak. This work provides estimated upper boundaries for selective concentrations (lowest MICs) and PNECs for resistance selection for all common antibiotics. In most cases, PNECs for selection of resistance were below available PNECs for ecotoxicological effects. The generated PNECs can guide implementation of compound-specific emission limits that take into account risks for resistance promotion.

Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAntibiotic Use and ResistanceGut microbiota and healthAntibioticsBiologySelection (genetic algorithm)Antibiotic resistanceResistance (ecology)EcosystemBacteriaMicrobiologyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistry

MeSH terms

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPredictive Value of TestsSpecies SpecificityDatabases, FactualDrug Resistance, Bacterial

Funding

  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Citations
925
FWCI
18.67
field-weighted impact
References
75
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: What Are the Big Questions?
Environmental Health Perspectives · 2012 · 1,324 citations
Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease
Nature Reviews Microbiology · 2006 · 2,011 citations
Effluent from drug manufactures contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals
Journal of Hazardous Materials · 2007 · 1,540 citations
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 1995 · 106,483 citations
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Bioinformatics · 2010 · 21,473 citations
Related articles
The role of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature
Environmental Microbiology · 2009 · 676 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Concentrations of antibiotics predicted to select for resistant bacteria: Proposed limits for environmental regulation · Scinovex