Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

DNA barcoding Australia's fish species

Robert WardTyler ZemlakB. H. InnesPeter R. LastPaul D. N. Hebert

Abstract

Two hundred and seven species of fish, mostly Australian marine fish, were sequenced (barcoded) for a 655 bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (cox1). Most species were represented by multiple specimens, and 754 sequences were generated. The GC content of the 143 species of teleosts was higher than the 61 species of sharks and rays (47.1% versus 42.2%), largely due to a higher GC content of codon position 3 in the former (41.1% versus 29.9%). Rays had higher GC than sharks (44.7% versus 41.0%), again largely due to higher GC in the 3rd codon position in the former (36.3% versus 26.8%). Average within-species, genus, family, order and class Kimura two parameter (K2P) distances were 0.39%, 9.93%, 15.46%, 22.18% and 23.27%, respectively. All species could be differentiated by their cox1 sequence, although single individuals of each of two species had haplotypes characteristic of a congener. Although DNA barcoding aims to develop species identification systems, some phylogenetic signal was apparent in the data. In the neighbour-joining tree for all 754 sequences, four major clusters were apparent: chimaerids, rays, sharks and teleosts. Species within genera invariably clustered, and generally so did genera within families. Three taxonomic groups-dogfishes of the genus Squalus, flatheads of the family Platycephalidae, and tunas of the genus Thunnus-were examined more closely. The clades revealed after bootstrapping generally corresponded well with expectations. Individuals from operational taxonomic units designated as Squalus species B through F formed individual clades, supporting morphological evidence for each of these being separate species. We conclude that cox1 sequencing, or 'barcoding', can be used to identify fish species.

Identification and Quantification in FoodIchthyology and Marine BiologyFish Biology and Ecology StudiesBiologyPhylogenetic treeDNA barcodingGenusZoologyTaxonomic rankCytochrome c oxidase subunit ICladePhylogeneticsEvolutionary biology

MeSH terms

AnimalsAustraliaElectronic Data ProcessingBase CompositionBase SequenceCodonElectron Transport Complex IVDNAFishesMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySpecies SpecificityCluster AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNADNA Primers

Funding

  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • University of Guelph
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Citations
4,176
FWCI
18.41
field-weighted impact
References
40
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Molecular phylogeny of oysters belonging to the genus Crassostrea through DNA barcoding
Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies · 2015 · 21 citations
Biological identifications through DNA barcodes: the case of the Crustacea
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2007 · 487 citations
The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonomy
Systematic Biology · 2005 · 1,310 citations
The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH‐BOL
Journal of Fish Biology · 2009 · 959 citations
A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis
BMC Genomics · 2008 · 685 citations
References
Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit
Molecular Biology and Evolution · 1999 · 3,595 citations
DNA Barcoding: Promise and Pitfalls
PLoS Biology · 2004 · 992 citations
Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes
PLoS Biology · 2004 · 2,652 citations
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
Molecular Biology and Evolution · 1987 · 60,290 citations
Biological identifications through DNA barcodes
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2003 · 13,103 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.