Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Vol. 2018(8) · pp. CD002213–CD002213
Scott ReevesLaure PerrierJoanne GoldmanDella FreethMerrick Zwarenstein

Abstract

This updated review reports on 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria (nine studies from this update and six studies from the 2008 update). Although these studies reported some positive outcomes, due to the small number of studies and the heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures, it is not possible to draw generalisable inferences about the key elements of IPE and its effectiveness. To improve the quality of evidence relating to IPE and patient outcomes or healthcare process outcomes, the following three gaps will need to be filled: first, studies that assess the effectiveness of IPE interventions compared to separate, profession-specific interventions; second, RCT, CBA or ITS studies with qualitative strands examining processes relating to the IPE and practice changes; third, cost-benefit analyses.

Interprofessional Education and CollaborationNursing Roles and PracticesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesCINAHLPsychological interventionInterprofessional educationHealth careMEDLINEMedicineMeta-analysisIntervention (counseling)Family medicineRandomized controlled trial

MeSH terms

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient CareHealth PersonnelHumansInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamProfessional PracticeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome
Citations
1,703
FWCI
287.95
field-weighted impact
References
141
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.