articleTop 10% cited
Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 1971 · Vol. 49(2B) · pp. 467–477
Harry Levitt✉(The Graduate Center, CUNY)
Abstract
During the past decade a number of variations in the simple up-down procedure have been used in psychoacoustic testing. A broad class of these methods is described with due emphasis on the related problems of parameter estimation and the efficient placing of observations. The advantages of up-down methods are many, including simplicity, high efficiency, robustness, small-sample reliability, and relative freedom from restrictive assumptions. Several applications of these procedures in psychoacoustics are described, including examples where conventional techniques are inapplicable.
Image and Signal Denoising MethodsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignStatistical and numerical algorithmsPsychoacousticsRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceSimplicityReliability (semiconductor)MathematicsPhysics
MeSH terms
Acoustics
Citations
5,497
FWCI
2.78
field-weighted impact
References
26
Percentile
91%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT)
Journal of Neuroscience · 1988 · 1,636 citations
In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · 1990 · 518 citations
Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults
Brain · 2003 · 1,474 citations
Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment
Behavioural Brain Research · 2002 · 426 citations
Adaptive psychophysical procedures
Vision Research · 1995 · 624 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
