Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 1990 · Vol. 37(2) · pp. 783–788
Stephen C. StrotherM. CaseyE.J. Hoffman

Abstract

True coincidence count (TCC) and noise equivalent count (NEC) curves were measured with a standardized 20-cm-diameter nylon cylinder for five different CTI/Siemens PET (positron emission tomography) scanners with several scanner-collimator combinations: (1) 831/08-12 with 1-mm collimator septa; (2) 933/08-12 and 933/08-16 with 3 to 1-mm tapered collimator septa; and (3) 931/08-12 with 3 to 1-mm tapered and a 1-mm collimator septa and the 931/08-16 with 3 to 1-mm tapered collimator septa. In addition, TCC and NEC curves on the 933/08-12 were compared with those from an Alderson brain phantom. In general, it is found that the TCC curves indicated peak count rates and activity levels that were as much as 50% higher than the corresponding values from NEC curves. The primary factor causing this difference is the noise effect of the randoms component. It is demonstrated that, compared to the Alderson brain phantom, the standard 20-cm cylinder is a poor predictor of count rate performance for PET brain imaging.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesCollimatorImaging phantomNuclear medicineScannerNoise (video)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Positron emission tomographyPhysicsOpticsMedicine

Funding

  • National Institutes of Health
Citations
539
FWCI
5.62
field-weighted impact
References
15
Percentile
96%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.